3. Reference Checks Are Not Due Diligence

Author:
Märt Ostra
Date:

September 5, 2026

Almost every vendor selection process includes reference checks. And almost every reference check follows the same pattern: the vendor provides a list of three to five customers who are happy to speak with you. You call them. They tell you the product is great. You feel reassured. You proceed.

Why Standard References Are Almost Useless

Vendors curate their reference lists carefully. The clients on that list have been asked to be references because they're satisfied customers, often ones who have a positive ongoing relationship with the vendor and a natural incentive to maintain it. They've also, in many cases, been coached on what to emphasize.

None of this means they're being dishonest. They genuinely may have had a good experience. But their experience may not reflect yours, for reasons that won't surface in a thirty-minute call.

What Genuine Due Diligence Looks Like

Real due diligence requires going beyond the list. Here's what that means in practice:

- Find references the vendor didn't give you. Use LinkedIn to identify people who have worked with this vendor, ideally at organizations similar to yours. Reach out directly. People who aren't official references tend to be considerably more candid.
- Ask about the hard moments. Every implementation has them. The question isn't whether things went wrong, it's how the vendor behaved when they did. Did they own it? Did they resource up? Did they become defensive and contractual?
- Talk to the people who actually did the work. The executive sponsor who provides an official reference had a very different experience of the implementation than the project manager who was in the trenches. Talk to both.
- Ask about total cost of ownership, not just licensing. What did the implementation actually cost vs. what was quoted? What ongoing costs weren't clear upfront? What would they do differently?

Evaluating Implementation Partners Specifically

If you're working with a system integrator or implementation partner, the due diligence bar needs to be even higher. These are the people who will be in your organization for months or years, and their capabilities, culture, and staffing practices will have an enormous impact on your outcome.

- Ask specifically who will be on your project, not the partners and senior consultants who appear in the proposal, but the actual team members who will be there day to day.
- Understand their bench depth. What happens when a key resource rolls off your project? How quickly can they backfill? What's their track record on staffing continuity
- Ask for examples of projects that didn't go well and how they were handled. If they can't point to any, that's itself a signal.

References are a starting point, not a conclusion. The organizations that invest in real due diligence before they sign tend to have substantially fewer surprises after they do.

New way for knowledge transfer

We have created an interactive newsletter experience where our experts share real-world insights, proven strategies, and hands-on tasks you can apply right away. Each month brings a new topic and focus, giving you practical knowledge and actionable takeaways - all in one powerful learning journey.

Our topic in July 2026 is Fundamentals First: Most transformations don't fail because the technology was wrong. They fail because the foundation underneath it was never solid. This category is about the unglamorous work that determines whether everything else succeeds - fixing broken processes before you automate them, understanding what readiness actually requires, getting your data into a state you can trust, and making sure your senior leaders are genuinely aligned, not just publicly supportive. None of it is exciting. All of it is necessary.

July 2026

Topic: Fundamentals First

We have created an interactive newsletter experience where our experts share real-world insights, proven strategies, and hands-on tasks you can apply right away. Each month brings a new topic and focus, giving you practical knowledge and actionable takeaways - all in one powerful learning journey.

Our topic in August 2026 is The Cost of Blind Trust: Optimism is useful until it becomes expensive. This category is about what happens when hope and faith replace rigorous scrutiny - in how you plan, in how you select vendors, and in how you evaluate whether an initiative is actually on track. Vendors are incentivized to keep you excited. Sunk costs are incentivized to keep you committed. Neither of those forces is working in your interest. Learning to ask harder questions, earlier, is what separates transformations that deliver from ones that just consume budget.

August 2026

Topic: The Cost of Blind Trust

We have created an interactive newsletter experience where our experts share real-world insights, proven strategies, and hands-on tasks you can apply right away. Each month brings a new topic and focus, giving you practical knowledge and actionable takeaways - all in one powerful learning journey.

Our topic in September 2026 is Know Your Scale: The most underestimated risk in any transformation isn't technical - it's scope. Organisations consistently underestimate how far the change actually reaches, what a successful pilot really predicts, and how long it takes people to genuinely adopt a new way of working. This category is about doing the honest math before you commit to a plan, mapping the full blast radius of the change, understanding what pilots do and don't tell you, and building an approach that's actually sized to the transformation you're undertaking, not the one you wished you were.

September 2026

Topic: Know Your Scale